Q: Does a research paper have a conclusion?

A:  In general, a research paper does have a conclusion, otherwise it's merely a list of regurgitated facts. Specifically, however, my research paper does not have a conclusion.

I really wanted it to. When I started the paper I intended to have a conclusion, a good one, too, not one of those lame ones like "Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it," but a real good, thoughtful conclusion, one that would make readers marvel at my cognitive abilities, earn a high grade and give me the minimum credits needed for graduation.

Then I got to drinking - you know how life college life can be - and the conclusion slipped my mind. As did the paper itself. But I was able to jot a few things down on this pizza box last night. I spilled some hot sauce on it, but you can still make out a few words. This one looks like "agrarian." And I'm pretty sure that says "counter-intuitive." This would have been a hell of a paper.

When you grade my research paper, I ask you to take into account not only the finished product, but also my intentions.

You should also take into account the quality of these photographs I took of you banging your teaching assistant on her patio last Thursday. It wasn't easy to pull focus from that far away, that late at night, in so short a time, as drunk as I was, but I did it. You have to admit they're pretty good. Out of consideration for your wife, I had them enlarged and labeled. I know she has poor eyesight. Nice lady. Big fan of your's.

I'm sure you'll make the right decision.

Q: Is Curly a realistic character in Of Mice and Men?

A: I guess in the sense that he has legs and arms and hair and uses words when he talks and wears gloves when he works, yes, he is realistic. But, in terms of his actions, the character is not only unrealistic but completely unfaithful to the original.

At no point in the book does Curly accidentally hit anyone with a board or get poked in the eyes or slap himself in the face or say "Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk, nyuk" or anger Moe with his trademark buffoonery. There's not even a character named Moe.

The portrayal of Curly in this so-called "work of literature" absolutely stinks. In fact, the whole book stinks. It's devoid of laughs, with the exception of the big oaf who can't even stroke a girl's pretty hair without snapping her neck. What a goof.